Among its findings, the court observed respondent and his attorney had 'substantially misstate' the length of time he had paid spousal support to appellant. On October 31, 2012, the trial court filed its order after hearing granting appellant's request to set aside the order terminating spousal support. She also asserted that respondent or his attorney committed perjury in advising the court that he had continuously paid spousal support. Specifically, she claimed she had not been given notice that the trial court would be making an order addressing the length of the parties' marriage. As grounds for her request, she alleged fraud, perjury, and lack of notice. On December 8, 2011, appellant filed an application to set aside the support order under Family Code section 3691. On May 31, 2011, the trial court filed its order after hearing in which it ordered spousal support terminated as of December 31, 2010. The matter was heard on December 9, 2010. On December 7, 2010, appellant filed a responsive declaration opposing the OSC. On October 26, 2010, respondent filed an order to show cause (OSC) to terminate spousal support. Rule 8.220(a)(2) of the California Rules of Court provides that in such. On October 26, 2010, respondent filed an order to show cause (OSC) to terminate spousal. The history of this proceeding is well known to the parties and this court. In re the Marriage of JOSHUA SAKOV and ESTER ADUT.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |